Review the requirement coverage
Check that each requirement has a proposed answer, the required format and an explicit status. A completed row is not by itself proof of compliance.
Review the response before the prose leaves the team.
A useful RFP workflow makes coverage, evidence, ownership, caveats and approval status visible before a proposal or tender response is delivered.
A review workflow for RFP responses
Review the supporting evidence
Inspect the source, its version, the owner and the caveat. Separate a model-generated statement from a document or decision that supports it.
Approve the exact version
Record who reviewed the response and which version they reviewed. If a source, price, requirement or answer changes, recheck the affected rows.
Why human review remains part of the product
AI accelerates assembly
The assistant can help analyse and draft from selected context. It does not know whether an unsupported business commitment should be made.
Review makes responsibility explicit
A reviewer decides whether the source is authoritative, whether the answer is complete and whether the organisation is ready to use it externally.
Delivery keeps its own gate
The final export supports the organisation’s process. It does not submit the response to the buyer or certify that every annex is complete.
Frequently asked questions
What does a reviewer check?
Reviewers check requirement coverage, source evidence, caveats, ownership, required files and the exact version ready for delivery.
Does approving one draft approve every later version?
No. A material change to a source, requirement, price or answer can require review of the affected version again.
Does Helvabase submit the proposal to the buyer?
No. Helvabase supports preparation and controlled export; your organisation keeps its own submission gate.